Decidability and Undecidability Results for Nelson-Oppen and Rewrite-Based Decision Procedures
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the context of combinations of theories with disjoint signatures, we classify the component theories according to the decidability of constraint satisfiability problems in arbitrary and in infinite models, respectively. We exhibit a theory T1 such that satisfiability is decidable, but satisfiability in infinite models is undecidable. It follows that satisfiability in T1 ∪ T2 is undecidable, whenever T2 has only infinite models, even if signatures are disjoint and satisfiability in T2 is decidable. In the second part of the paper we strengthen the Nelson-Oppen decidability transfer result, by showing that it applies to theories over disjoint signatures, whose satisfiability problem, in either arbitrary or infinite models, is decidable. We show that this result covers decision procedures based on rewriting, complementing recent work on combination of theories in the rewrite-based approach to satisfiability.
منابع مشابه
New Undecidability Results for Properties of Term Rewrite Systems
This paper is on several basic properties of term rewrite systems: reachability, joinability, uniqueness of normal forms, unique normalization, confluence, and existence of normal forms, for subclasses of rewrite systems defined by syntactic restrictions on variables. All these properties are known to be undecidable for the general class and decidable for ground (variable-free) systems. Recentl...
متن کاملUndecidability Results for Bisimilarity on Prefix Rewrite Systems
We answer an open question related to bisimilarity checking on labelled transition systems generated by prefix rewrite rules on words. Stirling (1996, 1998) proved the decidability of bisimilarity for normed pushdown processes. This result was substantially extended by Sénizergues (1998, 2005) who showed the decidability for regular (or equational) graphs of finite out-degree (which include unn...
متن کاملSuperposition and Decision Procedures Back and Forth
Two apparently different approaches to automating deduction are mentioned in the title; they are the subject of a debate on “big engines vs. little engines of proof”. The contributions in this thesis advocate that these two strands of research can interplay in subtle and sometimes unexpected ways, such that mutual pervasion can lead to intriguing results: Firstly, superposition can be run on to...
متن کاملModal Process Rewrite Systems
We consider modal transition systems with infinite state space generated by finite sets of rules. In particular, we extend process rewrite systems to the modal setting and investigate decidability of the modal refinement relation between systems from various subclasses. Since already simulation is undecidable for most of the cases, we focus on the case where either the refined or the refining p...
متن کاملCombining Sets with Elements
We address the problem of combining decision procedures for sets with decision procedures for objects that are not (necessarily) sets. We present Nelson-Oppen-based and tableau-based combination methods, we prove their correctness, analyze their complexity, and we describe heuristics that aim for efficiency.
متن کامل